Other stuff shelf · snapshot 2026-10-26

"Other stuff": the shelf that is not a category

Every scraped catalogue has a residual bucket, and this is it. Forty-eight rows that are not shoes, not outerwear, not tees, not headwear and not accessories — underwear, swimwear, dresses, activewear sets, vests. It is the least predictable shelf in the index and the one where the median is least useful.

48 rows, median $37.14, half between $22.70 and $55.70, from $0.93 to $89.12. It is a residual category, not a product type: 15 of 48 rows carry a brand and the rest are generic garments. Read the row name before the price, and expect the price to describe a garment you did not picture.

48Rows on this shelf
$37.14Median row
$22.70–$55.70Middle half
$62.26Median landed, EU

Six rows across the price range

One row from each sixth of the shelf, cheapest first — a sample of the spread, not a shortlist. Every tile links to the product page, where the live price and the size grid live.

What is actually in the bucket

The rows here range from branded underwear and swim shorts to sleeveless "design" tops and a $63.13 dress. There is no shared construction, no shared weight and no shared price logic — which is exactly what a residual bucket means. If you are budgeting, budget per row, not per shelf.

The weight is the one thing the bucket hides

A 0.5 kg assumption is a guess that is wrong in both directions: a pair of swim shorts is 150 g and a heavy knit dress is over a kilo. On the economy line the difference is one half-kilo step, about $4.20 — small, but it is the reason a shelf-wide landed estimate is a floor rather than a quote.

Why this page still exists

Because the alternative is worse: a reader who sees "median $37.14" on the price index and assumes it describes a category will be surprised by what arrives. Naming the residual for what it is — 48 rows, 15 branded, $0.93 to $89.12 — is more useful than pretending the bucket has a shape. It also documents the classification quality of the whole index: if this shelf is loose, the others are approximate too, and the row is the only reliable unit.

From row price to landed price

One item per parcel, economy line, assumed 0.5 kg, 21% modelled VAT for the EU. Germany charges 19%, Poland 23%. Freight is the planning default from the shipping page, not a live quote.

Landed cost at three points of the other stuff distribution
RowGoodsFreightHandlingVAT 21%LandedFreight share
Cheapest quarter — 25th percentile of the shelf $22.70 $12.50 $2.20 $7.39 $44.79 28%
Median row — the middle of the distribution $37.14 $12.50 $2.20 $10.42 $62.26 20%
Upper quarter — 75th percentile $55.70 $12.50 $2.20 $14.32 $84.72 15%

Who is on this shelf

Brand names as the row spells them; 15 of 48 rows carry one, the rest are described by shape.

Brands on the other stuff shelf, by row count
BrandRowsShare of shelf
Chanel48%
Gucci36%
Nike36%
Prada24%
Adidas12%
Burberry12%
No brand named3369%

Before you open the row

Every number here is recomputed at build time. Same 307-row snapshot as the spreadsheet; the live sheet is the only live price.
Open the spreadsheet

The other shelves

Same method, same snapshot. The full comparison — every shelf side by side — is on the price index, and the raw rows are in the dataset.

Questions about this shelf

What is in the "Other stuff" category?

Underwear, swimwear, dresses, activewear sets and sleeveless tops — 48 rows that do not fit the five named shelves. Median $37.14, range $0.93 to $89.12.

Can I trust the price of a row in this category?

The price is accurate for the row; what it does not tell you is what the garment weighs or how it fits. Check the product page for the material and the QC photos for the measurements before you accept the parcel.

Should a residual category exist at all?

Yes, as long as it is labelled honestly. The alternative is forcing underwear into "Accessories" and dresses into "T-Shirts", which makes both shelves wrong. The cost is that this one has no typical price — hence the page.

Related pages

Open the Kakobuy spreadsheet